Cookie preferences

HundrED uses cookies to enhance user experiences, to personalise content, and analyse our web traffic. By clicking "Accept all" you agree to the use of all cookies, including marketing cookies that may help us deliver personalised marketing content to users. By selecting "Accept necessary" only essential cookies, such as those needed for basic functionality and internal analytics, will be enabled.
For more details, please review our Cookie Policy.
Accept all
Accept necessary
search
clear

Creating Resilient Schools for Quality Education

Collaboratively using data with school stakeholders to make schools better, safer and resilient

Participatory school improvement planning (SIP) helps schools use their scarce resources in the most effective way. School, community and government stakeholders analyse learning data and school performance, agree priorities, allocate budgets, and hold one another accountable for improvements in education quality. As a result, the SIPs respond to local realities and foster local ownership.
Shortlisted
play_arrow

Overview

HundrED shortlisted this innovation

HundrED has shortlisted this innovation to one of its innovation collections. The information on this page has been checked by HundrED.

Updated June 2025
Web presence

5

Countries
Students basic
Target group
Inclusive, quality education where every stakeholder understands their role and actively supports their local school to be the best it can be. Schools are resilient and stay open so education can continue during climate events offering children a safe space and a sense of normality during disruption. Schools and communities are empowered to advocate for what they need based on evidence.

About the innovation

Why did you create this innovation?

Schools are required by governments to have School Improvement Plans. These plans give government, schools, and communities the knowledge and tools to improve learning outcomes. However, many school leaders lack capacity, there is little community understanding, inadequate structured support, and vulnerable groups such as girls and children with disabilities are often left behind.

Increasingly progress is hampered by climate events. Africa is one of the most vulnerable continents to climate disasters and carries a disproportionately vulnerable population. After a climate event, children may struggle to learn, miss school, or drop out completely for many reasons: forced migration or displacement; increased sickness (malnutrition in droughts, diarrhoea in floods); reduced funds for school due to disrupted family incomes; routes to school being blocked or school buildings being damaged or repurposed.  

When schools under-perform and education is disrupted, increasing numbers of children face barriers to employment and earning potential later in life, especially girls and children with disabilities.

However, education itself plays a vital role in equipping young people with the required knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviours to successfully adapt and respond to their local realities. An evidence-based school improvement plan, developed by school stakeholders using data collected and analysed locally can ensure schools are resilient and all learners are supported.

What does your innovation look like in practice?

Participatory School Improvement Plans (SIP) developed with governments, schools and their communities are evidence-based and respond to local realities. The SIPs align with the regular annual planning cycle.
DATA: User-friendly tools collect and triangulate evidence from different sources (interviews, school records, classroom observations) and trained government Education Officers work with headteachers to use these data effectively.
ANALYSIS: As a more nuanced picture of challenges emerges, teams identify and target underlying causes of poor school performance, such as scarce continuous professional development, poor leadership, lack of gender and disability awareness, weak community engagement or climate impact.
PARTICIPATION and OWNERSHIP: The Link model supports school stakeholders (including learners, teachers, communities and government officers) to assess and remove barriers such as gender, disability, low-literacy, or climate disruption. All stakeholders are involved in the decision-making process leading to greater ownership and accountability.
GOVERNMENT: District government staff work with headteachers and stakeholders to agree improvement priorities based on evidence and aligned with government plans.
MONITORING: A range of stakeholders, using tools developed by Link in partnership with government, take on responsibility for monitoring the SIP. Local challenges are addressed using local solutions which encourages sustainability and ensures resilience.

How has it been spreading?

Link’s participatory SIP model was first developed in collaboration with communities and governments over 25 years ago in South Africa, and is now central to our work in Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, and Uganda.

In Uganda, over 12,000 parents, teachers and local leaders designed, implemented, and monitored evidence-based, locally relevant, inclusive SIPs. Results showed more effective school leadership, improved teaching practices and greater coordination in district-level education planning in over 100 schools, benefiting 55,000 children. 6,300 community members (619 children, 164 individuals with disabilities) participated in school-community meetings, fostering collective responsibility.

Working with the Ministry of Education in Malawi, Link supported development of Malawi’s first scalable SIP. Results showed 99% of headteachers found the model useful and 25% saw increased community participation. There was an 18% increase in the schools that met or exceeded national standards for learning. A focus on ‘Green SIPs’ has supported a further 138 schools vulnerable to climate disasters.

In Ethiopia, participatory SIPs have been scaled up by government to 456 schools benefiting over 12,000 teachers, and 460,070 learners.

In Rwanda, schools meeting minimum standards in learner outcomes and attainment doubled from 40% to 80% benefitting 28,000 learners.

How have you modified or added to your innovation?

Link’s participatory SIP model is determined by government processes and the national education standards. Link, alongside government partners, has modified and adapted the model according to evidence and need. Gender and disability inclusion often reveal themselves as priorities during data analysis and feedback. Disruption to learning from climate events is becoming more frequent.

As the SIP model responds to local realities, areas for modification and targeted support vary. Aligning with government policies and processes and the local data ensures that the SIP meets the needs of each individual school.

For example, Malawi is facing increasing disruption to learning from climate events such as floods and high winds. Link adapted the participatory SIP model to focus more on climate resilience. Collaborating with national and district government, Link streamlined Malawi’s Disaster Risk Management protocols and worked with civil society to educate schools and their communities how to embed these procedures within their SIPs. With government climate and education experts, Link added activities to the regular SIP process, such as Inclusive Hazard Mapping, guidelines for setting up a Disaster Risk Management Club for learners, and inclusive emergency drills, resulting in ‘Green School Improvement Plans’ where schools not only develop a SIP that speaks to their teaching and learning needs but also ensures they can respond to and manage climate events, building their resilience

If I want to try it, what should I do?

Detailed information on Link's approach to this and other innovations, projects and programmes can be found on our website.

We would be happy to discuss how our participatory SIP model can improve learning and make schools resilient to change.

The step-by-step guide in the following pages gives more detail.

Implementation steps

Government engagement on national SIP process to review, refine and align with priorities
Engage with Ministries of Education to develop and/or refine indicators of school performance and data collection tools which are aligned with national policies, standards, and national priorities. Support government teams to ensure their indicators accurately capture all aspects which affect school performance, such as inclusive teaching for girls and children with disabilities, community engagement, children’s safety, or climate impact.
Strengthen capacity of government staff in SIP
Train and support district and national education staff on how to collect data in schools using inclusive and relevant indicators and tools, to input and analyse the data, and to develop accessible school performance reports that make sense at different levels of the system, including schools and whole districts. Pilot these indicators and tools to check relevance and ease of use.
Support data collection, analysis and report writing
Support government staff to collect data and triangulate evidence from diverse sources (interviews, school records, classroom observations). Work alongside local government officers to analyse the data and identify and target underlying causes of poor performance. Collaborate with government teams to develop accessible reports that feedback the data in an appropriate format.
Strengthen capacity of community and other local stakeholders
Where required, review and refine school governance body (e.g. school management committees, parent teacher associations) guidelines and SIP monitoring tools/ templates to ensure roles and responsibilities for supporting schools are clear and meaningful. Support local government education officers to train school leaders and school governance bodies. Ensure feedback is given and acted upon.
Support a participatory school improvement plan meeting
Support school leaders and local government staff to facilitate a school-community meeting where community members, parents, learners, and all stakeholders come together to discuss the school’s strengths and weaknesses, and using the evidence-based reports, set the annual priorities for school improvement plans. Ensure the meeting is inclusive and all voices are heard. This is a form of accountability monitoring where local challenges are addressed by local solutions.
Support government and schools to use the data for implementation of the plans
Support officials in local government to use the school-level plans and data across an area to inform their own planning and allocation of resources, enabling integrated district planning based on evidence of schools’ needs. Once the plans are signed off by government all stakeholders work to implement the plans and achieve the targets they have set.
Check-in sessions
Check-in with local government education officers, school leaders and school governance bodies to ensure the SIP activities are being implemented. Check that the SIP monitoring tools being used by the community are useful and supportive. Adjust if necessary, in preparation for the next planning cycle and according to specific circumstances.

Spread of the innovation

loading map...